Dick Fuld, Disgraced Former CEO Of Lehman Brothers, Makes Bizarre Comeback

Dick Fuld, part villain and part unforgivably very confused bystander to the financial crisis in the eyes of most -- and a victim of the financial crisis to himself -- made a bizarre comeback at a conference in New York on Thursday.

In his first public appearance (other than sworn congressional testimony) since the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Fuld blamed regulators, borrowers and rumors for the end of the 158-year-old, $47 billion firm he led. It was a “perfect storm” that sank Lehman, not his own leadership or decisions, Fuld said, while touting Lehman’s “success” to the audience. He also claimed that every one of the 27,000 employees who once worked for Lehman had been a risk manager, because they owned stock in the firm.

Lehman’s September 2008 collapse was the first of many bank failures and market seizures that fall. It sparked the financial crisis that ended in a $416 billion bank bailout and left the country mired in the Great Recession.

Fuld's comments were initially carried live on the financial news network CNBC, but the feed was pulled by conference organizers part way through his remarks. Technically, Fuld was at the conference to deliver a keynote address titled, "How Emerging Growth Companies Can Succeed in Today's Capital Markets: Perspectives from My Journey." His comments, however, were a well-rehearsed if less-than-convincing defense of his own actions leading up to the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.

He denied that Lehman was a failed company in September 2008 and intimated that he and the firm were victims of a conspiracy centered around former competitors in regulatory positions with a vendetta against him. Fuld, nicknamed the “Gorilla” during his career for his overly aggressive style, seemed temperamentally unchanged, telling one conference questioner, “Why don’t you bite me?”

Months prior to Lehman’s fall, Fuld had declared that “the worst of the impact of the financial markets is behind us” and pushed subordinates to take more risk, sidelining or firing those who disagreed with him.

Fuld is now working at his own firm, which is focused on the kind of small deals he would have scoffed at as CEO of a massive investment bank. The venue itself was an indication of his fall: an otherwise barely noteworthy conference focused on selling shares in tiny public companies.

Nike Just Became Part Of The FIFA Corruption Scandal

It is not just FIFA officials and little-known sports marketing groups who are finding themselves in the crosshairs of the U.S.'s investigation into long-term corruption in international soccer. Nike seems to be caught up in the maelstrom as well.

Remarks by U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Wednesday, as well as indictments released by the Justice Department the same day, indicate that the iconic American corporation has been pulled into the massive global corruption scandal. Detailing the long history of bribery by some of the world's soccer governing bodies, Lynch said those offenses also extended to "agreements regarding sponsorship of the Brazilian national soccer team by a major U.S. sportswear company."

Her remarks referred to the landmark ten-year, $160 million deal that Nike struck in 1996 to sponsor the Brazil national team's well-known yellow, blue and green uniforms. Last year, Jose Hawilla, the owner and founder of the Florida- and Brazil-based sports marketing firm the Traffic Group, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud for, among other things, accepting and passing along bribes and kickbacks in connection with that deal. Hawilla paid these bribes and kickbacks to a senior official in the Brazilian Football federation (CBF), who signed the deal along with Hawilla and four Nike executives.

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch discusses the investigation during a press conference on Wednesday.

Lynch's comments followed the Justice Department's announcement that 14 people, including nine FIFA officials, had been arrested and indicted on Wednesday on numerous charges that include "racketeering, wire fraud and money laundering conspiracies."

The Justice Department's indictment notes that Hawilla and the unnamed Brazilian official also engaged in other corrupt deals in the years following the Nike contract. While it does not accuse Nike of any wrongdoing or of any knowledge of Hawilla's corrupt practices, it is unclear to what extent Nike vetted Hawilla before allowing him to act as their middleman with the Brazilian soccer federation.

"Like fans everywhere we care passionately about the game and are concerned by the very serious allegations," Nike said in a statement to The Huffington Post on Wednesday. "Nike believes in ethical and fair play in both business and sport and strongly opposes any form of manipulation or bribery. We have been cooperating, and will continue to cooperate, with the authorities."

Nike introduced its first soccer boot in 1971, but its market share remained small. Globally, it was barely a player in a multibillion-dollar market, then dominated by its chief competitor, Adidas. In 1994, Nike began a major push to increase its presence in the soccer world. As part of this effort, the company's co-founder and chairman, Phil Knight, "openly set his sights" on sponsoring Brazil's national team that year. By 1996, the company was able to sign the deal with CBF and has supplied the Brazilian team's uniforms ever since.

Brazil soccer player Luiz Gustavo poses for pictures during the presentation of the team's new uniform for the 2014 FIFA World Cup on Nov. 24, 2013.

Now, however, Brazil's soccer federation is named in the Justice Department's investigation.

"Other alleged schemes relate to the payment and receipt of bribes and kickbacks in connection with the sponsorship of CBF by a major U.S. sportswear company, the selection of the host country for the 2010 World Cup and the 2011 FIFA presidential election," read a statement from the department.

In 2008, Nike renegotiated its contract with Brazil, which now lasts until 2018 and is expected to be worth $34 million, SportsPro Media reported last year.

Debt Forgiveness Could Save This Woman's Home, But Nation's Housing Chief Still Says No

Sylvia Alvarez didn't grasp the enormity of the crisis about to engulf her community until she returned to her office in Tampa, Florida, after a long weekend and found her voicemail filled with messages from distraught homeowners.

It was early 2008. The bottom had fallen out of both the housing market and the local economy, and record numbers of people had begun defaulting on their mortgages. Callers flooded the phone lines to the Housing & Education Alliance, Alvarez’s housing counseling agency -- not realizing the same forces that had wrecked their finances were also threatening to sink the agency they were now turning to for help.

“I was overwhelmed,” Alvarez said recently, recalling the twin challenges of trying to help people save their homes and also keep afloat her nonprofit, which was largely dependent on vanishing support from the mortgage industry. “I remember saying, ‘How in the hell are we going to do this?’”

Seven years later, the Housing & Education Alliance has rebounded remarkably, after subsisting for years on a meager budget. The organization’s survival is a testament to the perseverance of Alvarez and her staff, who worked with little or no pay for years. The foreclosure rate in Tampa is the third highest in the country, but the situation is vastly improved from even two years ago.

But this otherwise feel-good story comes with a distressing coda. After years of working long hours at great personal sacrifice to save other people’s homes, Alvarez is now on the cusp of losing her own.

The specific problem that Alvarez faces is the same one that's vexed hundreds of her clients -- and many of her own staff -- over the years: She is underwater on her mortgage, meaning she owes substantially more on her home than it is worth.

More than three years ago, with government prodding, the mortgage industry began offering some homeowners in this situation a form of assistance known as principal reduction. Big banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, under multibillion-dollar legal settlements with the Justice Department and other federal and state agencies, could claim credit by writing off some of the debt owed by people like Alvarez.

Debt forgiveness can yield benefits to everyone involved. The homeowner is no longer tempted to walk away, leaving a home to decay and lose more value. And the person, or family, isn’t subjected to the financial and emotional trauma of losing a home.

On paper, Alvarez would seem a perfect candidate. She fell into default in 2008, after her income as executive director of the Housing & Education Alliance plummeted to $17,000 from $73,000 the year before, according to forms the nonprofit filed with the IRS.

After years of reduced income and struggling to make ends meet -- "I ate a lot of Cheerios and Special K," she says -- Alvarez finally saw her salary rebound this year to its pre-crash level. And because of all the missed payments and accumulated fees and interest, Alvarez and her husband now owe $419,000 -- over $100,000 more than the couple thinks the house is worth.

But Alvarez, like the majority of the 5 million or so borrowers who are underwater on their mortgages, is not eligible for principal reduction. That’s because her loan, like millions of others, is controlled by Fannie Mae, the mortgage giant that was put into conservatorship by the U.S. government after an epic bailout in 2008. Despite its status as a quasi-government entity, and despite supposed pressure from senior members of the Obama administration, Fannie Mae doesn't permit debt forgiveness on its mortgages.

For years, administration officials blamed this on a career bureaucrat who'd ascended to the top of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the group created to oversee Fannie and its cousin company, Freddie Mac. That official, Edward DeMarco, vigorously opposed principal forgiveness, arguing that offering such relief would pose a “moral hazard.” Writing off some people's debt, he said, would likely encourage other people to stop paying their mortgages in order to take advantage of the same opportunity.

There was an economic rationale as well, DeMarco argued. Under the conditions of the bailout, Fannie and Freddie are essentially required to turn over all their profits to the government -- and supposedly, forgiving homeowner debt could mean eating into those profits. (As of this spring, the two groups have paid back roughly $40 billion more than they received during the bailout.)

DeMarco, who was then the acting director of the FHFA, hewed to this reasoning even after his own agency produced research showing that offering targeted principal reduction could actually save the companies money. He continued to make this argument even as housing activists protested in front of his own home.

In late 2013, the Senate confirmed former Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.) to replace DeMarco, fueling hopes that the housing companies would quickly reverse their position. But Watt hasn't appeared any more receptive to debt forgiveness than his predecessor, and with the foreclosure crisis receding into the distance, the Obama administration has not seemed inclined to press the issue.

Through a spokesperson, Watt declined an interview request from The Huffington Post. Instead, an FHFA spokeswoman forwarded snippets of Watt’s comments on the subject to Congress. In one exchange from December, Watt sparred with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a vocal proponent of principal reduction.

"It has been six years since Congress created FHFA and in all that time your agency has never, not once permitted a family to reduce its principal mortgage through Fannie or Freddie," Warren said.

Warren cited a Congressional Budget Office report from 2013 that determined a modest principal reduction plan could help 1.2 million borrowers and save Fannie and Freddie -- and by extension taxpayers -- $2.8 billion.

In response, Watt said he was looking for a "win-win" situation in which "responsible" borrowers might get assistance.

"We're still studying the issue," he told a House committee in January.

Kevin Stein is an associate director of the California Reinvestment Coalition, a group that has advocated for broad-based principal reduction. Stein said he is frustrated with Watt's responses, but hasn't given up hope. "Maybe the time to end the studies and make a decision is now," he said.

In recent months, Alvarez has sought to offload her home through a short sale, in which Fannie would accept less than the amount owed on the mortgage and agree to release Alvarez from her financial obligation. Earlier this week, though, Fannie Mae rejected an offer from a prospective buyer that would have priced the house at about $253,000, according to Alvarez.

Alvarez said she isn’t sure what to do next.

"We have no sense of security," she said. “Now I know exactly what our clients have gone though."

Los Angeles Votes To Raise Minimum Wage To $15

Los Angeles on Tuesday became the biggest U.S. city to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Following a hot debate, the city council voted 14 to 1 to approve a plan to gradually increase the required wage to $15 an hour by July 2020. The current $9-an-hour minimum wage was already slated to increase to $10 in January.

The pay bump will affect about 567,000 workers in the city.

“This is a game changer,” Tsedeye Gebreselassie, a senior staff attorney at the wage advocacy group National Employment Law Project, told The Huffington Post minutes after the vote. “L.A. is such a huge city, and it’ll have a national impact on the normalization of $15 as the minimum wage.”

The move comes less than a year after the city council voted to raise hourly pay to $15.37 for nearly 10,000 hotel workers.

The debate over the new minimum wage divided the city. Business groups, including the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce and the Valley Industry and Commerce Association, warned that the increase would hurt small companies and lead to layoffs.

“A lot of businesses are going to struggle,” Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association, told HuffPost minutes after the vote. “There’s a lot of employees are going to get raises, but there’s also some employees that are going to lose their jobs.”

Los Angeles, the nation’s second-largest city, joins other West Coast cities, including Seattle and San Francisco, which raised their hourly wages to $15 following waves of protests across the country. Meanwhile, the federal minimum wage has stagnated at a paltry $7.25 an hour for the last four years, despite calls to raise it from President Barack Obama.

“You can see over the course of two years, there’s an evolution of position on what a reasonable minimum wage is,” John Schmitt, research director at the liberal-leaning nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, told The Huffington Post ahead of the vote. “There’s political activity taking place at city and state level, and it’s moved the national debate.”

The city-by-city approach represents one of a two-pronged strategy by activists to increase minimum wages across the country. The second, centered around the wage activism group Fight for $15, has seen mass demonstrations against fast-food companies, which are some of the largest employers of minimum-wage workers.

“It’s highlighted for the American public that raising wages isn’t just about helping workers and making sure people who are struggling to have enough to get by,” Gebreselassie said. “It’s to address income inequality and have truly meaningful economic recovery.”

“People like me, who work hard for multibillion-dollar corporations like McDonald’s, should not have to rely on food stamps to survive,” Albina Ardon, a 29-year-old mother of two who works at a McDonald’s in Los Angeles, said in a statement sent by a Fight for $15 spokeswoman. “My life would be completely different if I were paid $14 an hour. I could afford groceries without needing food stamps, my family could stop sharing our apartment with renters for extra money, and I’d be able to provide my daughters with some security.”

The wage hike will face one final council vote later this year after City Attorney Mike Feuer drafts a plan to implement the new base pay.

Apple CEO Tim Cook Urges GWU Graduates To Develop Moral Compass

Apple CEO Tim Cook urged graduating George Washington University students to follow their values and find a job that helps them do good in a commencement speech delivered Sunday.

Cook talked of justice and injustice in a speech that paid homage to Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter, delivered to a crowd on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., VentureBeat reported. The university expected about 25,000 people to attend the commencement exercises, according to the outlet.

The CEO mentioned the civil rights leader three times in his 20-minute speech, and said that King, along with Kennedy, had been one of his childhood heroes.

Cook, who grew up in Alabama, shared a story about his first visit to the nation's capital in 1977, at the age of 16. On the trip, Cook met with then-President Carter right after meeting Alabama's governor, George Wallace, who had opposed desegregation in the '60s. (Wallace is perhaps best remembered for his 1963 inaugural address that called for "segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever.")

“Meeting my governor was not an honor for me,” Cook told the graduates. “Shaking his hand felt like a betrayal of my own beliefs. It felt wrong, like I was selling a piece of my soul.”

It was very different from meeting America's then-president, Cook said.

“Carter was kind and compassionate. He held the most powerful job in the world, and had not sacrificed any of his humanity,” he said. “It was clear to me that one was right and one was wrong."

Cook ended with a call for graduates to live their values and change the world -- and said that working at Apple had helped him do just that:

We believe that a company that has values and acts on them can really change the world. And an individual can too. That can be you. That must be you. Graduates, your values matter. They are your North Star. Otherwise it’s just a job -- and life is too short for that. ... You don’t have to choose between doing good and doing well. It’s a false choice, today more than ever.

Your challenge is to find work that pays the rent, puts food on the table, and lets you do what is right and good and just.

Words to aspire to.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article stated incorrectly that Cook spoke about John F. Kennedy. He spoke about Robert F. Kennedy.

Why A Wegmans In Brooklyn Is Great News For Low-Income Locals

The announcement that Wegmans plans to open a Brooklyn store sent a wave of excitement through New Yorkers on Wednesday. The proposed grocery store, slotted to open in 2017, would bring affordable food prices to a segment of the Fort Greene neighborhood that has long been waiting for its own high-quality supermarket.

The site sits next to the Farragut Houses, a public housing project near the Brooklyn Navy Yard, a city-owned industrial park on the East River. For many years, residents had little access to cheap grocery stores with large selections of fresh foods, even as new buyers poured money into historic townhouses and luxury condos several blocks away.

Back in 2010, former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration committed to a redevelopment plan for the dilapidated houses along Admiral’s Row at the Navy Yard. The plan included the construction of a supermarket, but it never got off the ground. Two potential developers had already pulled out by the time Steiner NYC secured its bid this week, with a Wegmans store anchoring the project.

The Navy Yard is situated along the northern border of Fort Greene, where home prices have climbed steadily over the last five years, according to market data from real estate website Trulia.

Townhouses within a quarter-mile of city housing are selling for around $1,100 per square foot, said Jerry Minsky, a broker at Douglas Elliman who also lives in Fort Greene. “You’re getting a lot of people from Europe and Manhattan with an extreme level of wealth,” Minsky said, adding that the area is “going through this Shangri-La now of being great for young professionals” who are making investments with parental support.

As a result, goods and services are also becoming more costly. A few affordable grocery stores in Fort Greene have already or will soon be shuttered, and public housing residents often travel several miles to Costco and Pathmark for lower prices, according to The New York Times.

“It’s hard for people on a lower income to deal with the cost of living when the neighborhood reaches a crescendo like in Fort Greene,” Minsky said. “I can go to a bodega and get organic if I choose it, but some people can’t afford that.”

The arrival of Wegmans, known for its fresh produce and low prices, will likely be a relief for its new neighbors. The store is also looking forward to serving the local community, said Jo Natale, a spokeswoman for the chain. It will begin by creating jobs, with an initial hiring round of 450 employees, many of them locals. Wegmans hopes its Brooklyn store will eventually employ as many as 600 people.

The chain had been looking to open a store in New York, but first needed a substantial plot of land. “This one is 74,000 square feet and large by New York standards,” Natale said of the Admiral's Row location.

The retailer was eager to settle in the Navy Yard when the site was proposed, having previously worked with the developer Steiner NYC on two New Jersey stores in Bridgewater and Manalapan.

Wegmans is still a relatively small retailer, with just 85 stores, mostly located in upstate New York and the mid-Atlantic region. But its popularity is buoyed by a cult-like following of devoted customers and a strong reputation for employee compensation. It’s been named the best supermarket in the country several times.

“Even this morning, we’ve been surprised by the reaction on social media,” Natale said Wednesday. “It’s very heartwarming. We are by most measures a small regional supermarket chain, and it makes it even more exciting to look forward to the opening.”

For now, Steiner doesn't expect the $140 million redevelopment project to impact nearby housing prices.

“New York is so dense that I don’t think it will change the fundamental dynamics of the neighborhood,” said Doug Steiner, chairman of Steiner NYC and Steiner Studios, one of the largest soundstages outside Hollywood and the set of several HBO shows, including "Girls."

As part of the redevelopment deal, Steiner NYC will preserve two buildings on the site. One will be converted into a community facility, and the other set aside for retail or light industrial space, Steiner said.

In addition, the firm will restore an area of around 20 acres near Kent Ave. as part of a studio expansion.

“Wegmans checks all the boxes in terms of affordability and quality, and they’re fantastic employers,” Steiner said. “They’re the ideal supermarket, and it’s long overdue for the area, both for shopping and job opportunities.”

AOL CEO: Verizon Deal Will 'Extend The Tarmac' For Mobile

NEW YORK -- AOL CEO Tim Armstrong said Tuesday morning that the company's $4.4 billion acquisition by Verizon would bolster AOL's hope of dominating the burgeoning and lucrative mobile ad market.

Comparing to the company’s mission to an airplane’s flight path, Armstrong said selling to Verizon was not changing direction but, rather, “extending the tarmac.”

“This is not a deal done out of necessity,” he said before a crowd of staffers gathered in the fourth-floor reception room of the company’s Manhattan headquarters. “This is a deal done out of where the future is overall.”

According to Armstrong, one benefit of the deal announced Tuesday morning will be that, thanks to AOL’s push to make its wide variety of media properties mobile-friendly, the merged company will have access to a huge amount of user data from those sites. And while Armstrong did not mention it, data could also flow in the other direction, from legacy Verizon businesses to AOL media properties. The elusive end goal for tech companies is to squeeze every possible penny out of, or 'monetize,' the data they collect. Monetizing data generally means sharing it with other companies, which tends to make the privacy-minded users who generate that data uncomfortable. Now, Verizon and AOL will be able to monetize their data without sharing it with outside parties.

Though Armstrong insisted Verizon wanted to buy AOL mostly for its content properties -- which include The Huffington Post, Engadget and TechCrunch -- many have speculated that the company’s newly launched automated ad platform, AOL One, is the real prize. AOL earned $995 million from display and search ads on its own properties last year. The company made almost as much -- $856 million -- selling ads for third-party sites, according to Fortune. Still, Armstrong said all editorial brands were included in the deal, allaying worries about spinoffs, at least in the near term.

The deal may also boost the companies' work around mobile video.

AOL began investing heavily in video two years ago, when ad sales for online video in the U.S. hit $2.8 billion, a 19 percent increase from the previous year, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau. That year, the company bought the programmatic video ad platform Adap.tv -- which became a cornerstone of AOL One. A month later, HuffPost launched HuffPost Live, the publication’s streaming video network.

“Mobile is the centerpiece,” Armstrong said. “We need to be on every single screen.”

Verizon, which streams television channels through its FiOS division, also has a hand in the lucrative live-sports business with the exclusive NFL Mobile app.

“You’re going to be at a company that does everything from NFL live games to HuffPost Live,” Armstrong said.

He said the deal was completed just after midnight, hours before the public announcement was made. It began as an operational deal, but became a merger. If the acquisition gets the green light from regulators, the deal will close before the end of summer, Armstrong said.

"This deal,” he said, “puts us at the big table.”

Jenny Che and Damon Beres contributed reporting.